Schumer irrelevant

Listening to Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi lecture the President (and us extremists) to select a conservative judge nominee that represents “the mainstream” and will treat the Constitution as a living document, shows how dumb they think we are and how dumb they really are.First of all, Schumer and Pelosi know that no real conservative judge would ever consider the Constitution as flimsy as their spines at a NOW fundraiser, so their talking points are a set-up. It would be nice if ultra-liberals would mind their business and not tell us how to conduct our agenda. Like we’d listen to them anyway?
The other day, I heard Senator Charles Schumer (spit) talking about the Alito nomination. Among his other frothings and rants, he said George W. Bush "wants to radically change the balance of the Supreme Court."
Even a blind pig occaionally finds a truffle, and Senator Schmuck triggered a thought in my head:
With all that in mind, what's Bush up to with the Supreme Court? It looks like he's simply looking for the best candidates he can find, those whose judicial philosophy seems to be compatible with his own, and puts them forward. (I dunno how the Miers nomination fits in, so I'm gonna call it an aberration.) And if that happens to mean that the Court ends up moving in a more conservative direction, I think that's only fair -- it's been drifting leftward for decades, as more and more Republican nominees get caught up in the DC cesspool and find themselves making more and more decisions that please their new neighbors and social circles.
So, Senator Schmuck doesn't like the idea of Bush "upsetting the balance" of the Supreme Court, replacing the squishy Justice O'Connor with someone who appears to have firm Constitutional principles. I dunno how he gets off acting so "shocked" by this -- it's just the latest manifestation of Bush's radical progressivism.
But then again, Senator Schmuck has never impressed me with his intellect